Supplement-Industry Insiders Reveal All!
My friend Jeff O'Connell has a terrific expose of the supplement industry in the current issue of Men's Health. Jeff and I worked together at Weider in the mid-1990s -- he was at Flex, while I was at Men's Fitness. He eventually became editor of Muscle & Fitness before moving to MH shortly after I left. (I think he even has my old office.)
Everyone who works in or writes about the fitness industry has heard stories about the tricks of the supplement trade. One persistent rumor I've heard over the years -- which I assume Jeff heard at least as many times -- is that certain companies will build buzz for a new product by spiking it with ingredients that don't appear on the label.
Unlike me, Jeff actually found sources willing to go on the record about it:
Chris Lockwood, formerly the senior category director of diet, energy, food, and beverage at the supplement retailer GNC and now a doctoral candidate in exercise physiology at the University of Oklahoma, recalls taking a popular protein powder in the early 1990s: "When I first took it, I got great gains. I felt great. I got strong. I got lean. But then something happened to it." Years later, he related his experiences to one of the product's formulators who confirmed for him that the powder had been spiked with Clenbuterol, an asthma drug that supercharges your metabolism.
"Drugs like this don't typically show up on lab tests, unless someone's looking for them," says Lockwood. "The idea is to use them to quickly build a customer base and steal market share by making a product that works 'better' than its competitors."
With apologies for going on a tangent, I remember the first time I heard of Clenbuterol. I had recently started working at Men's Fitness when one of the trainer/models we regularly featured in our workouts came by the office. The trainer had one of the most amazing physiques any of us had ever seen, a walking anatomical chart. His skin looked like beige Saran Wrap applied directly to his muscles and veins. He had trained an actor who'd made a remarkable transformation for a recent movie; the movie was well-reviewed, but the buzz was about the actor's physique. The trainer, laughing, told my coworkers he'd injected the actor with Clenbuterol to achieve the look everyone was talking about.
Getting back to Jeff's story in MH, you can see how spiking a protein supplement with a powerful fat-loss agent would get the meatheads talking.
Jeff also writes about a practice I didn't know much about:
One recent example of possible fairy dusting -- or perhaps simply the same net effect due to poor formulation -- comes from a ConsumerLab.com test of Muscle Marketing USA ATP Creatine Serum. The manufacturer claimed one serving provided 250 milligrams (mg) of a "proprietary creatine phosphate complex." But Dr. Cooperman and his colleagues determined it contained only 26 mg actual creatine. "To put that in perspective, a single dose of most products promises and delivers 5,000 mg creatine," says Dr. Cooperman. GNC ProPerformance, MuscleTech CellTech, and EAS Phosphagen, among others, all met their label claims. (Through e-mail correspondence, Muscle Marketing USA claimed that their product's trade secret formula is too complex for ConsumerLab.com to accurately determine its creatine content.)
When I've asked friends in the supplement industry to explain how they do what they do, the conversation always comes around to cost: You just can't make good supplements on the cheap. The best materials are expensive.
I don't have a broad perspective on the choices you face when you walk into your local GNC or Vitamin Shoppe. I've been using Biotest products almost exclusively for years; they taste the best and don't cause the gastric side effects I've experienced with some other brands.
So the only advice I can offer is, don't go with the cheap stuff. You can't build muscles with fairy dust.
Tuesday blog meat
- A new study found that doing a combination of endurance and strength exercise was better for people with type 2 diabetes than doing one or the other exclusively. But I'm confused about something: The people who did both did twice as much exercise as the others -- 4.5 hours a week, vs. 2.25 hours. So how do they know that simply doing 4.5 hours a week of anything wouldn't produce the same effect? And wouldn't 5 or 6 or 7 hours a week of exercise be even better? And how many people with type 2 diabetes are able or willing to do exercise of any type or duration?
- From the restless mind of Joe Stankowski: "armadillo back" vs. "porn-star butt."
0 recs |
7 comments
|
Comments
Great post, Lou!
Turning attention elsewhere... let's play "Guess Who the Geared Up Actor Is." I have a short list:
Nicholas Cage for "Con Air"
Will Smith for "Ali"
Tobey Maguire for "Spider-Man"
My bet's on number two.
You're cold
And notice that I wasn't specific about the gender of the actor in question.
The plot thickens...
With the gender non-specificity (I was thrown by the term "actor") and the year now in play, Angela Bassett's name comes to mind (1993's "What's Love Got to Do with It").
No confirmations or denials needed... it's just fun to guess.
Was it?
Pumped up actor
by George Haberberger on Sep 18, 2007 3:08 PM EDT reply actions









