Deadlift and Row Your Way to Happiness!
Okay, here's a quick, totally unscientific theory that I'm going to unspool today, because I'm short on time, I have an idea, I'm going to run with it, and it's my blog, gosh darn it!
My fifteen-week-old son is just now starting to try to flip over onto his belly when we put him down on his back. It's fun to watch the little critter gradually figuring out that he can actually control those odd, prehensile things on the ends of his arms, and that those floppy, curled-up things that swing from each hip joint are part of his body too.
To date he's spent most of his life on his back: looking up, often curling his body up into the familiar fetal position. He's happy curled up in a ball: he does it when he's scared or uncomfortable, reverting to his womb-state.
But on his belly, he comes out of that position. He extends his neck and his spine so he can see what's in front of him. His arms wing out to the side and before him, as if in preparation for crawling. His hips extend and his legs kick and push behind him, as if he's scrambling for movement. His posterior chain muscles--lower traps, rear deltoids, spinal erectors, glutes, and hamstrings--spring to life.
In this position, Dylan looks a bit like he's doing an old-school 'Superman' stretch. And I have to say, he loves it.
My theory is that I think he sees the possibilities when he's in that position: he can move, he can survey the world; soon he'll be able to gather and grasp things.
Now, as I said, this is a totally made-up theory, but stick with me: the muscles on the front of the body appear to develop first--in part because you're on your back all the time. The curled-up position feels safe, protected, hidden. Only when you start to turn over--as Dylan is now--do the back muscles really start to fire.
And that experience, I believe, was probably pretty profound for all of us back when, just as it is for Dylan now. Those posterior-chain muscles are really the ones that propel us into action, into the world. They allow us to stand tall, move and affect our environment.
Our anterior musculature helps us hide, protect ourselves, push the world and its dangers away. Important functions, to be sure--but I wonder if there's something primally comforting about doing a lot of pushing exercises as opposed to pulling? I wonder if pushing exercises actually make us feel safer and more protected, whereas pulling movements challenge us to expand and expose ourselves a bit more to the world?
The real question then becomes, why do typical gym rats fall in love with bench pressing and crunches and curls while shunning deadlifting, chins, and rows? Is it simply because the pecs, abs, and biceps are mirror muscles? Or is it weirdly scarier to work the posterior chain, because of that inital programming?
But maybe--and here's my way-out theory--doing deadlifts and rows will actually make us happier and feel more capable, because they fire up the muscles that make us face the world and help us move into it.
As I said, I'm talking primal, but who hasn't felt a touch of kinship with our hairier, less eloquent forebears when heaving barbell and dumbbells around a sweaty gym?
0 recs |
6 comments
|
Comments
I like your theory....
strengthening your posterior or dorsal side definitely makes you more capable, especially of lifting things up from the ground in front of you. Another interesting observation is that our brains, feelings/moods, and body language are very connected. We generally slouch forward when we are feeling down or not confident. Training the muscles in front of us, such as bench press (esp the techniques body builders use) reinforces that slouched posture. Deadlifting has the opposite effect on your posture. So, not only are you more capable, but you look more confident in your body language. You could be on to something with this conjecture. I have been thinking about writing a post on strength training, posture, and body language for a while. I will keep your theory in mind.
Dan Hubbard
Thanks, Dan!
As a guy with tons of theatre and acting training, I was taught that body language and mood/emotional life are symbiotically linked—the more you sit up straight and pull your shoulders back (for instance), the more confident you feel; the more you smile (regardless of your actual emotional state) the happier you’ll be. It’s the ‘fake it till you make it’ school. So if you live in a body that’s constantly slouched, what message are you sending to your psycho-emotional body versus the message you’ll send if your posture is good, if you practice solid form every time you row and deadlift? In general, I think the activation of those back-body muscles sends a powerful message to the brain and nervous system: I’m capable, I’m ready for action, I’m an effective person.
As I said—a theory. But moving well and exercising effectively affects us on subtle as well as gross levels—maybe there are ways of manipulating those effects to our advantage. Thanks for the shout-out and visit any time. —Andrew
by Andrew Heffernan on Mar 25, 2009 1:05 AM EDT up reply actions
Your Theory Makes Sense
Sorry to keep dipping into history, but think of the famous Charles Atlas ads, where the 98-lb weakling who got sand kicked in his face decides to change. If being scrawny and wanting to hide forms the original psychological impetus to get big and strong, it makes sense that, on a subconscious level, that person continues to favor the muscles of the “protective” anterior chain. Then again, working the posterior chain is also just plain harder work.
Now how do you test the theory
Funny I only started deadlifts two months ago and my confidence level is higher than its been in years- besides all of my back development is actually improving the front. Don’t know the theory here but i imagine there is some reason
Very interesting!
There is actually some scientific backing to this if you look at the “startle response”
When there is a high enough threat, we tend to go into the fetal position again (and also protect the face). Most of the these muscular actions are contractions on the “front” side fo the body. This is taught in Z Health also.
I would be interested in your thoughts on this.
Rock on!
Mike T Nelson PhD©
Michael T. Nelson MS, CSCS, RKC, ZCPT PhD Student, Kinesiology, U of MN
Z-Health connection...
Yes, that seems to be one of Dr. Cobb’s major jumping-off points: to counteract the front-body adduction/flexion startle response/habitual movement pattern. So if curled up and flexed is what our bodies do when we’re stressed, how do we ‘tell’ our bodies that we’re relaxed and calm? Opening, abducting, extending—generally working the back-body. Makes sense.
by Andrew Heffernan on Mar 27, 2009 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions

by 







