Attention Must Be Paid
Lately I've been sounding a note about subtlety of movement, and how strength-training types should strive to master movements like the squat, deadlift, lunge, pullup, and so on with the same precision that a martial artist learns kata or a ballet dancer learns to plié: more than simply exercises to be hurried through, they're the nuts and bolts of the practice of strength training; every time we do them we can learn from them.
But precision of movement is a rarity in this hemisphere: perfect, deep squats and strict pull-ups are so rare in the gym that when someone does them right I want to applaud--I don't care if it's a high-school kid with 135 on his back; if it's a good, solid, deep squat, I'm impressed, as much because the kid's ego hasn't overtaken his common sense (I'm remembering my days in my parents' basement, fooling myself into thinking that the half-rounded-back-Good-Morning with 275 pounds and no warmup was a legitimate squat. Shudder.)
Anyway: I was recently forwarded this video of an interview by Dr. Michael Merzenich with Anat Baniel, the latter of whom recently published a book called Move Into Life. Among other things, what they're discussing is a concept which is fast gaining 'buzzword' status: neuroplasticity, or the capacity of the brain to change and adapt. At first glance, what they're talking about--using simple movement as a mechanism for healing--is pretty far afield from the world of burnished pecs, iron-pumping, and weight-loss.
But Baniel makes a point early on in the interview that applies to all of us, iron-pumpers, personal trainers, body-workers and complimentary-medicine practitioners alike, and I think it's worth highlighting: that movement can be profoundly instructive and beneficial if AND ONLY IF you pay close attention to what you're doing. Careless movement, she suggests--and she uses strength training as an example--can have the opposite effect: you're practising and reinforcing a pattern that's sub-optimal and sometimes harmful.
I see very little precise movement in the gym: most of it is hurried, sloppy, and careless, and, in the long run, likely to do more harm than good. If I've said it before, I've said it a billion times: if you're in the gym exercising anyway...why not do it well?
3 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Form and Strength Training
Good points. I certainly try to pay close attention to the quality of movement, not just moving the weight from point A to point B by whatever means. A point that Christian Thibaudeau made in an article has stuck with me for years: Practice doesn’t make perfect; PERFECT practice makes perfect. I know he got this from someone else (Vince Lombardi?) but the point is that, if you perform a movement with sloppy form, you are actually reinforcing a faulty movement pattern. The more times you do it incorrectly, the harder it is to groove the correct motor pattern later on – perhaps after an injury has forced you to rethink the error of your ways.
Ego-too much weight results in bad form
I’m not the strongest guy so for years I always tried more weight than I could handle which resulted in what I believed was poor form. Lately I have lowerd the weight and have been trying better form. I’m getting better results and it feels better-great with chest presses and deadlifts. The other problem is that I have been given so much contradictory instruction over the years from friends and professionals I’m at a loss as to what the proper form consist of with many exercises.
Regardless of weight I really have no idea how to sqauat-maybe I do but it feels very unnatural and forced.
Squatting
I don’t know if I’m all that good a squatter either. I know it’s blasphemy, but I’m considering dropping them for good. Mike Boyle has a ‘two strikes and you’re out" rule: if you hurt your back squatting two times, no more squats for you. So his athletes do one-leg squats with 135 pounds on a dipping belt. Not bad.
I’m way past 2 strikes at this point.
by Andrew Heffernan on May 6, 2009 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions






